The news are all over the internet that the Lake Placid and the Anaconda franchises (that have produced four films each) will mash-up for a crossover flick, and I just realized that although I’m a big fan of the former four movies, I had not seen the later four. Well, I could not go see the upcoming movie without knowing the absolutely important stories that preceded it so here I am reviewing these snake oddities.
Anaconda (1997)
The first 35mm film reel I ever got my hands on was the trailer for Anaconda (1997) which was given to me by
one of the best tutors I had back when I was a student at the film school. I
still don’t know what to do with it since I don’t have a film projector, but I
hold on to the item because of the sentimental value that it has for me.
I remember that it was a big deal when Anaconda (1997) opened in the movie theaters here in Greece, and it
was even a big event when it was broadcasted for the first time on television.
Well, it cost $45
million to make, and people in the late ‘90s seemed to not know how unoriginal
it was [Jaws (1975) was made more
than two decades old and popcorn audiences have proven to not know their film
history] and as a result it grossed more than $136 million world-wide.
A scroll at the
beginning tells us a few generic things about anacondas, in case you are stupid
enough to not know that they are lethal snakes. Then Danny Trejo [Heat (1995)] is killed in the first
scene (much to everyone’s disappointment). And then we learn that the film is
set deep in Brazil’s Amazon where a documentary crew [that includes super-hot
Jennifer Lopez and rapper Ice Cube] will meet an ex-priest [Jon Voight who got
the part because Jean Reno did not] that is friends with the local oversized
snakes.
This was
directed by Luis Llosa who had previously made Fire on the Amazon (1993) which is a Roger Corman movie that is
featuring Sandra Bullock. Anaconda (1997)
is not very bad, but you rarely see things you did not in Fire on the Amazon
(1993). I mean that even at best Anaconda (1997)
looks like a big Roger Corman film of the period; for example check out the
slick wild life shots that are featured in both movies, they are almost
identical.
Another major problem with this film is that there is virtually no
suspense. You need good actors to do that (they had them), you need a good
director (they had him), you need the ‘monster’ to make a creepy first
appearance (it does kill a black panther here), but you also have to absolutely
have a better tone than Arachnophobia
(1990) which was another major-studio film that was actually way cooler.
Overall Anaconda (1997) does
occasionally bring Eaten Alive (1977)
to mind which is a good thing, but the end result feels more like a ‘good’ SyFy
film, and I would be more gentle had it been one, but we’ll get back to those
bellow.
Anacondas:
The Hunt for the Blood Orchid (2004)
The credits
sequence is quite impressive and it shows us a string of images through which
we learn that some natives in the jungle don’t pay attention to a lion but are
afraid of the titular creatures which happen to be gigantic.
Later, in New
York, we see a meeting between the heads of a pharmaceutical corporation (that
is evil like they always are in films that love stereotypes) and these guys
decide that in order to create a drug that will prolong human life (and will
make them more money than Viagra ever did for its manufacturers) they have to
send a mission to Borneo and grab the titular flowers.
Over in Borneo
the protagonists pay 50 grand to Bill Johnson [Johnny Messner] to take them to
the flowers with his boat which he calls Bloody Mary. Now, all that sounds very
much like the first film, and in fact this sequel here is trying to imitate the
preceded instalment’s setting and central characters. But just when you thought
you saw everything before, Bloody Mary gets destroyed, and the main actors are
challenged into an adventure that is quite interesting, if not totally
original.
This was
directed by Dwight H. Little who also helmed Halloween 4: the Return of Michael Myers (1988) which is a
masterpiece. Anacondas: The Hunt for the
Blood Orchid (2004) cost half the money of the original’s budget, an
estimated $20 million, and it brought back half the money the original did too,
as it grossed an estimated $70 million; still a great success by any
accountant’s standards. Pretty much like the original the critics hated it, but
it appears that somebody did their maths right; and money talks, while bullshit
walks.
Anaconda
III
(2008)
On my way back
home, minutes before I sat down to watch this, I was thinking, why am I
enjoying these films so much? The answer was simple: the key is that my
expectations are low. Faye can still not understand why I torture myself.
Anaconda (1997)
had an all-star cast, while Anacondas:
the Hunt for the Blood Orchid (2004) did not, which you’d presume
would be the case a low-budget Sci-Fi Channel TV-movie, but the producers came
back with a vengeance and delivered David Hasselhoff (no introduction needed) in
the lead role. This third film in the franchise is also bearing the coolest
logo in the series which would look great as a tattoo, even if a bit
ridiculous.
In a research
facility where doctors experiment with snakes in order to find the cure to
cancer and Alzheimer’s something goes wrong (because the venue was understaffed)
and a gigantic and evil anaconda breaks out, which also happens to be pregnant.
Needless to say it kills a bunch of people on its way to freedom and the film
becomes very generous with its gore.
A team of
trigger-happy meatheads go on a mission to hunt the titular reptile but they
fuck up and many of their people are killed along with an innocent or two in
the midst of gunshots and explosions. That’s when the one and only David
Hasselhoff comes to the rescue, becomes the leader of the gang, and kicks some
major snake ass.
This and the
next film were cinematographed and directed by Don FauntLeRoy.
Anaconda
4: Trail of Blood (2009)
Anaconda
III
(2008) is probably my favorite film in this list, so I was
surprised a bit when Anaconda
4: Trail of Blood (2009) proved to be the least
enjoyable for me; as these two were shot back-to-back by the same director. Eh,
even the snakes don’t look very menacing.
In Anaconda 4: Trail of Blood (2009)
lead villain Murdoch [John Rhys-Davis, returning from the previous film] is
paying a team of bounty hunters $1 million (which is probably more than this
sequel’s budget) in order to find the titular snake’s serum (in order to cure
his bone cancer) and kill the good scientist that created it [Crystal Allen,
returning from the previous film].
No comments:
Post a Comment